Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Baldwin v. Aviva Life and Annuity
as 2:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Richard Baldwin
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin et al v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02346
Plaintiff:
Richard Baldwin and Laura Baldwin
Defendant:
Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Baldwin v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04219
Plaintiff:
Richard Baldwin
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Premier Funding Group LLC v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company et al
as 2:2014cv01633
Plaintiff:
Premier Funding Group LLC
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity Company , Crump Life Insurance Services Incorporated , Richard Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bratton v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Edward Bratton
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , Russell Davis , Richard Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Jack Williams Tire Company, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02052
Plaintiff:
Richard Baldwin
Defendant:
Jack Williams Tire Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pereda v. Linderman et al
as 2:2011cv02388
Plaintiff:
Mark A Pereda
Defendant:
Mike Linderman, Stephen Kingsland, Richard Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Thomas v. State of Oregon, et al
as 10-35816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
