Cases 21 - 30 of 49
ESTATE OF JASPER JOHNSON, SR. v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv03046
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN R. LAYTON, ESKENAZI HEALTH CENTER, INC., J. VAHLE and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JASPER JOHNSON, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01573
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales
Defendant:
City Of New York , Bill De Blasio and Lisette Camilo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Diaz (Morales)
as 17-3608
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Diaz, Jesus Mendez and Jose Ruiz
Defendant - Appellant:
Ricardo Morales
MORALES VASQUEZ v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2017cv03284
Petitioner:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Spaulding
as 1:2017cv01079
Petitioner:
Ricardo Morales
Respondent:
Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. NY F&B Services LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales
Defendant:
NY F&B Services LLC and Ertunc Gundogdu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luna et al v. Benny's Burritos, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luna, Miguel Luis Yat Chic, Sinuhe Flores Munoz and others
Defendant:
Benny's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Benny's Burritos, Blockhead's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Blockheads, Egg White, Inc. doing business as Blockheads and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Ricardo Torres
as 15-11320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO MORALES TORRES
Morales v. Cassady
as 4:2014cv00943
Petitioner:
Ricardo Morales
Respondent:
Jay Cassady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
