Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, John Roberts, Chief Justice SCOTUS, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice SCOTUS and others
Morrison v. Neustrom et al
as 3:2014cv01604
Plaintiff:
Richard Morrison
Defendant:
Michael W. Neustrom, Dean L. Guidry and John F. Dietz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09517
Plaintiff:
Laura Morrison and Richard Morrison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Morrison v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-4242
Petitioner:
RICHARD MORRISON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Morrison v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02393
Petitioner:
Richard Morrison
Respondent:
Eric Holder and Geauga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
INTEGRATED CLINICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. COMPREHEND SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv07017
Plaintiff:
INTEGRATED CLINICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
COMPREHEND SYSTEMS, INC. and RICHARD MORRISON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Dietz v. Dietz
as 1:2011cv01692
Plaintiff:
Anne Bennett Morrison Dietz
Defendant:
John Ford Dietz
Interested_party:
Richard Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Richard Morrison
as 11-11827
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD MORRISON
C. H., II, et al v. Rankin County School District, et al
as 10-60697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. H., II, A Minor, By and Through His Mother and Next Friend, L. H., and His Father and Next Friend, C. H., C. H., Individually and L. H., Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
RANKIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, KALVIN ROBINSON, RICHARD MORRISON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
