Cases 21 - 30 of 576
Hayden v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 2:2023cv01694
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pratt v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Robert Omer Pratt, Jr, Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert O Pratt
Defendant:
Indiana State of, LaPorte County IN, Frasican Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00466
Petitioner:
Lewis Brown and Robert O
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation CTF- Soledad et al
as 4:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Vickter Estrada, William Pardue and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and REhabilitation CTF- Soledad, Craig Alan Koenig, Blake R Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayer CropScience LP et al v. Pierce
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bayer CropScience LP and Monsanto Technology LLC
Defendant:
Robert O. Pierce, Jr. doing business as Wolf Bayou Farms
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Domroes v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roger Domroes
Defendant:
Julie White, Bryan Hilton, G.S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert HaydenIn re: Robert Hayden
as 23-3001
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT O. HAYDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Hayden v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Dinkins v. USA, et al
as 22-56089
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT O. DINKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
