Cases 21 - 30 of 623
Scott v. FaZe Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
FaZe Holdings Inc., Angela Dalton, Mickie Rosen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Brown
as 24-30057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Scott Brown, Jr.
Lindberg v. CAP10 Partners, LLP et al
as 0:2024cv60102
Plaintiff:
Greg E. Lindberg and UKAT Parent, LLC
Defendant:
CAP10 PARTNERS, LLP, SULLIVAN STREET PARTNERS LIMITED, TENEO FINANCIAL ADVISORY LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Morris v. USA
as 2:2023cv00690
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Officer Jabril Muhammad, Sergeant Ricciardi and Borough of Colwyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robert Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency Administration and APA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Robert Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
