Cases 21 - 30 of 265
Shalom Barbour et al v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
Shalom Barbour
Estate Plaintiff:
Frances Carl Douglas
Defendant:
State Of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Ross et al
as 2:2022at00465
Defendant:
Cynthia Ross, State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ross v State of California, et al
as 2:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ross
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Folsom State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Powell
as 22-50081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Steven Powell
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00240
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00356
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Not Classified By Court:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rutherford v. Koock
as 2:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Rutherford
Defendant:
Koock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02242
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
