Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Pinkston v. Hall et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Larry Lee, Jerry Williams, C/O C. Hughey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Gene Newsome, Roger Davis, Kenneth Powell and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Morris et al
as 5:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kendeyette Harris
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Roger Davis, Anglea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC
as 17-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT, MATTHEW ABEDI, MONICA ADAIR SARGENT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S LEESBURG HYUNDAI, LLC, BROWN'S MANASSAS HYUNDAI, LLC and others
United States of America v. Davis et al
as 1:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Roger Davis, State of Iowa, Child Support Recovery Unit , Porrfolio Recovery Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sivori v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Frank Sivori
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Powell v. Timothy Morris, et al
as 16-60155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY POWELL, also known as Jamel Ansaaru El Majid
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, Warden, ROGER DAVIS, Food Director, GENE NEWSOME and others
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13898
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Roger Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Davis et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Mack
Defendant:
Roger Davis, Stanley Brooks, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
