Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,756
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 5:2024cv03328
Petitioner: Eliseo Santos
Respondent: Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant: TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff: EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Schoenly
as 5:2024cv01597
Plaintiff: Felipe Santos
Defendant: Brian R Schoenly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Santos v. Khoury et al
as 0:2024cv03381
Plaintiff: Stephen Santos
Defendant: Judge Coreen Khoury, Chester County Family Court, Governor Henry McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Holloway et al
as 6:2024cv03328
Petitioner: Eliseo Santos
Respondent: Ryan Holloway and Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Santos v. Bodiford et al
as 5:2024cv03389
Plaintiff: Eliseo Santos
Defendant: Scotty Bodiford, April Roberts and Ryan Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
United States of America v. Reid
as 24-1521
Defendant: DWIGHT REID, CASWELL SENIOR, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Diaz Borrome, et al
as 24-2039
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ESTEBAN RAFAEL DIAZ BORROME, also known as Esteban Rafael Borrome Diaz, BEN CARRASQUILLOSANTO, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ MONTESINO and others
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv02378
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant: BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE FLISZAR, ROBERT STETVOID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Di Santo v. US
as 24-1694
Plaintiff: PATRICK DI SANTO
Defendant: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?