Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Ray v. Adams et al
as 2:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Defendant:
George Adams, Leon Bolling, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosey v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00997
Plaintiff:
Eric Demetric Hosey
Defendant:
Karla Jones , Steve Watson and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Parton v. Blake Dorning, et al
as 16-16563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE PARTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DORNING, STEVE WATSON, CURTIS SANDERS and others
Watson v. Iron Bridge Tools, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60953
Plaintiff:
Steve Watson
Defendant:
Iron Bridge Tools, Inc. and Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parton v. Dorning et al
as 5:2015cv02221
Plaintiff:
Steve Parton
Defendant:
Blake Dorning , Steve Watson, Curtis Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12521
Plaintiff:
Tommie Watson and Steve Watson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Watson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12521
Plaintiff:
Tommie Watson and Steve Watson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alan Cooke, et al v. Terry Liles, et al
as 13-15735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN A. COOKE and GAGE T. COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY LILES, an individual, MURL HARPHAM, an individual, STEVE WATSON, an individual and others
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of Steve Watson and Lisa Watson v. Interline Brands, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of Steve Watson and Lisa Watson
Defendant:
Interline Brands, Inc. and Linx, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cooke et al v. Liles et al
as 1:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
Alan A. Cooke and Gage T. Cooke
Defendant:
Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
