Cases 21 - 30 of 41
McCoy, William v. Clements, Marc
as 3:2015cv00167
Petitioner:
William T. McCoy, Jr.
Respondent:
Marc Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NAZARETTE-GARCIA v. MCCOY
as 1:2014cv00754
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR NAZARETTE-GARCIA
Respondent:
T. MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARBAJAL v. MCCOY
as 1:2014cv00591
Petitioner:
ADRIAN CARBAJAL
Respondent:
T. MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARBAJAL v. MCCOY
as 1:2014cv00538
Petitioner:
ADRIAN CARBAJAL
Respondent:
T. MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
COOK v. MCCOY et al
as 7:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHAQUEL COOK
Defendant:
T MCCOY and Virginia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Lobosco et al
as 7:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael T. McCoy
Defendant:
Anthony R. Lobosco , Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company and American National Insurance Service Co.
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Michael T. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MCCOY EL v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2012cv01421
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. MCCOY EL
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, BANK OF AMERICA OFFICE/HEADQUARTERS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Charles Smith v. Walter Davi
as 11-7687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JERALL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER DAVIS, a/k/a W. Davis
Defendant:
B. LARGE, W. INGLE, T. MCCOY and others
McCoy v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01121
Petitioner:
Leonard T McCoy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
