Cases 21 - 30 of 2,159
VAN DER WERF et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
ESTHER VAN DER WERF, TOBY STOVER and ELIZABETH DASBURG
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and CHARLES F. SAMS, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Sedillo v. Master Control et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Sedillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Master Control, Joshua Marquez, CERT Team Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausbun v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Toby Ausbun
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Raner v. Knight Barry Title Inc
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Brenda Raner, Toby Johnson and Julie Lewandowski
Defendant:
Knight Barry Title Inc
Not Yet Classified:
Knight Barry Title Inc Data Incident Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murray v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Toby T. Murray
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carter v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Toby E Carter
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole et al v. Johns et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Scott W. H. Seu and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
