Cases 21 - 30 of 31,437
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Poe v. Haynes et al
as 4:2024cv04103
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Haynes, . Stevenson, . Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Cox Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary-Stuart Thompson Gay
Defendant:
Cox Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Myles v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Youn-Faa Oliver Myles
Defendant:
Paul A. Thompson, William K. Hammond and Clarence K. Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
PALACIOS v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06977
Petitioner:
LORENZO VIVAS PALACIOS
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CELENTANO v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06998
Plaintiff:
RALPH CELENTANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, WARDEN R. THOMPSON, DR. SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Garvey Manor Nursing Home
as 3:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Mae Thompson
Respondent:
Garvey Manor Nursing Home
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination)
SHAHID v. VAZQUEZ et al
as 1:2024cv06997
Plaintiff:
GARY SHAHID and Stanley Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
