Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hixson v. Casdorph et al
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Misty Hixson
Defendant:
Brandon Casdorph, Tony Hill and City of Perryton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tonty Hill, Sr., et al v. Macon Police Department, et al
as 13-11202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY HILL, SR. and TONY HILL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MACON GEORGIA, ANTOINNE JORDAN, Officer and others
Tony Hill v. Torrance Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv07221
Defendant:
Police Oficer K. Diaz, Police Officer K. Diaz, Police Officer D. Pickard and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Hill
Hill et al v. Macon Police Department et al
as 5:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Tony Hill, Sr. and Tony Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Macon Police Department , City of Macon , Officer Antoinne Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montoya, et al. v. Laborers International Union of North America, et al.
as 2:2010cv00891
Plaintiff:
Raymond S Montoya , Harvey Delgado , Charlie Umi and others
Defendant:
Laborers International Union of North America and Terence M O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Rasheed et al v. The City of San Ramon et al
as 3:2009cv02011
Plaintiff:
Kareem Rasheed and Khalid Anwari
Defendant:
The City of San Ramon , San Ramon Police Department , M. Gunning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Byirt et al v. United States Federal Government Agencies et al
as 3:2009cv00649
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Byirt and Carlos Carter
Defendant:
United States Federal Government Agencies, George Bush, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill #184013 v. Eaton County et al
as 2:2007cv00009
Petitioner:
Tony Hill #184013
Respondent:
Eaton County and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
