Cases 21 - 30 of 211
CULLEY v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant:
CHAD FERGUSON and DAVE WEDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jimmie Culley, Jr. v. Rodney Miller, et al
as 22-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY MILLER, Deputy, LOGAN OSBORNE, Deputy, JAMES TRAPP, Deupty and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 1:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
DEMARCO THOMAS
Defendant:
VANDERBUGH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, VANDERBUGH COUTY SHERIFFS DEPT and DAVE WEDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neora LLC v. Filippone et al
as 3:2022cv02056
Plaintiff:
Neora LLC
Defendant:
Mariel Filippone, Ali Wedding and Jill Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MAFFETT v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, RANDY STOKES, NURSING STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Taylor v. Kamal et al
as 7:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Christian Taylor
Defendant:
Sinan Kamal, B. Wedding and James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
