Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 327
In re: William Graham
as 23-3027
Petitioner: In re: William Charles Graham
William Graham v. United States
as 23-2953
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: United States of America
Graham v. USA
as 0:2023cv02498
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-2249
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM CHARLES NORTON
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Waters v. Coleman et al
as 5:2023ct03205
Plaintiff: William Charles Waters
Defendant: Ernie Coleman, Scott Hammonds, Lt. M. Ormond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. William Graham
as 23-2617
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: William Charles Graham
Graham v. Gilley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant: Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff: William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner: Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Joey Kimbrough v. Fortune Companies, Inc., et al
as 23-2119
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOEY KIMBROUGH and JOEY D. KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee: FORTUNE COMPANIES, INC., WILLIAMS CHARLES MENGES, JR., THOMAS JOSEPH HILLIGOSS, JR. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?