Cases 31 - 40 of 406
Orange v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Shampoire Orange
Defendant:
United States, Russell Keen, Bryan Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUSSAW v. LUMSDEN et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE K LUMSDEN, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, JUDGE EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houck v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv14893
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Houck
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Deangelo et al
as 2:2023cv10255
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Robinson
Defendant:
Jodi Deangelo, M. Mates, Houck and others
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P. et al v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P., MetroPCS California, LLC, Sprint Spectrum LLC and others
Defendant:
Alice B Reynolds, Karen Douglas, Darcie L Houck and others
Amicus Curiae:
Timothy A Gustafson, Eric Tresh and Alla Raykin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P. et al v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Assurance Wireless USA, L.P., MetroPCS California, LLC, Sprint Spectrum LLC and others
Defendant:
Alice B Reynolds, Karen Douglas, Darcie L Houck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Kissner v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD LEE KISSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, MDOC, individual and official capacity, BRIAN SHIPMAN, Chairman, Michigan Parole Board, individual and official capacity, GREGORY STRAUB, Acting Administrator, Michigan Parole Board, individual and official capacity and others
Houck v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Houck
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
YOUNG v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv04586
Petitioner:
CANDIDO YOUNG
Respondent:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, TERENCE HOUCK, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
