Cases 31 - 40 of 6,439
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Julie K. Harper
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davenport v. City of Sarasota et al
as 8:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davenport
Defendant:
City of Sarasota, Michael Dreznin, Aaron Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Jason Scott Harper
as 5:2024cv01027
Not Yet Classified:
Jason Scott Harper
Plaintiff:
Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Rob Bonta, David Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Universal Meditech, Inc. et al v. City of Reedley et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Universal Meditech, Inc. and David He
Defendant:
City of Reedley, Jeremy Harrison, Jesalyn Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
