Cases 31 - 40 of 331
Shim et al v. ADT LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01009
Defendant:
ADT LLC doing business as ADT Security Services, Timothy Brantley, Dylan Bickings and others
Plaintiff:
Jong Hee Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company and Jung Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Preddy v. ADT, LLC
as 0:2020cv60971
Plaintiff:
Alexia Preddy
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and ADT, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as ADT SECURITY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savage v. ADT LLC
as 1:2020cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brad Savage
Defendant:
ADT LLC dba ADT Security Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Horsey v. Tripp
as 20-704
Defendant / Appellee:
ADT LLC, FKA ADT Security Services, LLC
Defendant:
Elizabeth Slater, HR Generalist, Terrance Ried, Unit Manager and Scott Tripp, Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherry Horsey
Clayton Del Thibodeau v. ADT LLC, et al
as 19-56422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLAYTON DEL THIBODEAU
Defendant / Appellant:
ADT LLC, DBA ADT Holdings Inc., DBA ADT Security Services and ADT SECURITY SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. The ADT Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv03316
Plaintiff:
Jai'-La Armstrong, Chanel White, Jacob White and others
Defendant:
THE ADT CORPORATION, ADT LLC dba ADT SECURITY SERVICES and ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
