Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Shannon v. Nike, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02848
Defendant:
Adecco, USA, Inc. and Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randall Shannon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
JOHNSON v. ADECCO USA, INC.
as 2:2020cv05501
Plaintiff:
TASHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ADECCO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC et al v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01018
Plaintiff:
State Nationial Insurance Company and Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Camillone v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01579
Plaintiff:
JUDE CAMILLONE
Defendant:
GROCERY DELIVERY E-SERVICES USA INC doing business as HelloFresh, ADECCO USA, INC, Grocery Delivery E-Service USA, Inc. doing business as HelloFresh and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morris-Stokes v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03270
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leara Morris-Stokes
Staffworks, Inc. et al v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00747
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rohde, Karen Walser and Staffworks, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Victoria Rodabaugh, Maurica Gloria and Brianna Flint
Counter Claimant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenneth Taylor v. Michael Kors, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04931
Defendant:
ADECCO USA INC., Michael Kors Stores (California), Inc., Michael Kors (USA), Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Adecco USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mildred Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
