Cases 31 - 40 of 1,308
Akers v. AIDS Action Coalition of Huntsville
as 5:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Monica Akers
Defendant:
AIDS Action Coalition of Huntsville doing business as THRIVE Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
White v. Akers
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Akers v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv05967
Plaintiff:
Tanya Akers
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7141
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akers et al v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Debbie Akers and Doyal Akers
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christopher Koteras v. Daniel Akers
as 23-5979
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KOTERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
THE ESTATE OF CANDI AKERS et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv21758
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CANDI AKERS and LARRY MORGAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, KENVUE, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Castle v. Daniel Akers
as 23-5945
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT CASTLE
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
