Cases 31 - 40 of 86
In re: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 20-55780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MIKE RENEAU, JOSE GONZALEZ, CLR PLAINTIFFS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Wirtz v. Johnson (PLR3)
as 3:2020cv00200
Defendant:
Ashley Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Wirtz, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb-Bentley Associates Ltda v. Johnson
as 1:2019cv05064
Defendant:
Ashley Johnson
Plaintiff:
Cobb-Bentley Associates Ltda
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Perdue
as 1:2019cv23666
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue
Plaintiff:
Ashley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Woods v. San Diego Regional Office of the Department of Veteran's Affairs
as 3:2019cv01611
Plaintiff:
Byron O. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
San Diego Regional Office of the Department of Veteran's Affairs, Andrea Lapinski, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Charles Johnson v. Ashley Johnson
as 19-2390
Defendant / Appellee:
Ashley Johnson, Costello Property Management
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Diaz v. Johnson, et al
as 19-1612
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MEYERS, United States Office of Naval Research (ONR), ANDREI IANCU, United States Patent and Trademark Office, JIM GALAMBOS, Defense Strategic Technology Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DIAZ
Johnson v. McQuistion et al
as 4:2019cv04105
Defendant:
Ashley Johnson, John McQuistion and Damian Weets
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oak Residential Partners v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv02744
Defendant:
Ashley Johnson and and all other occupants
Plaintiff:
Oak Residential Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Diaz v. Johnson
as 19-1501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY JOHNSON, United States Navy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
