Cases 31 - 40 of 46
RAMIREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52856
Plaintiff:
JUAN B. RAMIREZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
John B Ramirez et al v. Mortco TRS LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01376
Plaintiff:
Juanda K Anderson and John B Ramirez
Defendant:
DOES and Mortco TRS LLC
Billey L Dooley Jr v. Rubylyn B Ramirez
as 5:2011cv01200
Plaintiff:
Billey L Dooley, Jr
Defendant:
Rubylyn B Ramirez
Kelly et al v. Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County et al
as 2:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
James V Kelly , Lawrence H Cain , H Teresa Cain and others
Defendant:
Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County , Port of Quincy, Port District No 1 of Grant County and Crescent Bar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Arceo et al
as 3:2010cv00906
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Arceo , B Ramirez and Riverside Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alander Crapps, Jr. v. B. Ramirez, et al
as 10-10959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALANDER CRAPPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
B. RAMIREZ, Officer, N. ALMA, H. AGUSTO, Officer and others
RAMIREZ v. SCHLOFMAN
as 3:2009cv00906
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO B RAMIREZ
Defendant:
Leonard Schlofman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Newman v. Pizza Hut Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv05059
Plaintiff:
David Newman
Defendant:
Pizza Hut Corporation, Adrienne Jaurigui and Javier B. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Ceja-Amaya v. The County of El Paso et al
as 3:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jose Eduardo Ceja-Amaya
Defendant:
The County of El Paso, The County of El Paso, Leo Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Herrera v. USA
as 4:2009cv00365
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Carlos B. Ramirez-Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
