Cases 31 - 40 of 214
OLSSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22416
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JAMES OLSSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01721
Plaintiff:
Brian James Allen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Rutledge
as 4:2022cv01074
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Weidlich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-13309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN JAMES WEIDLICH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Amos, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03485
Plaintiff:
Brian James Amos, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER et al v. HENSLEY et al
as 2:2022cv03511
Plaintiff:
Brian James Miller and Timothy Wylie
Defendant:
Charles Hensley, Danielle Baldwin, Sergeant Manner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jazz Estell El v. City of Greensboro, N.C.
as 22-1790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIEF JAZZ ELYSE ESTELL EL, ex rel. Danette Elyse Whitaker
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, CHIEF BRIAN JAMES, acting in his official capacity and individual capacity, OFFICER ANDREW MULDOWNEY, acting in his official capacity as a CITY OF GREENSBORO, N.C. officer and individual capacity and others
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Brian Hulse
as 22-11170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN JAMES HULSE
Swinney v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Brian James Swinney
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
