Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Morgan v. US
as 21-2231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv01546
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN STITT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26144
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Crow et al
as 5:2020cv01232
Defendant:
United States of America, Board of Dept of Corrections, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh, Ph.D. v. Extended Stay America, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01128
Defendant:
John Doe 3, ESH Hospitality Inc., Bruce N. Haase and others
Plaintiff:
Ravindra Singh, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morgan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00932
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv03260
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, Juventino Sagrero-Perez, Billy Moore and others
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, Juventino Sagrero-Perez, Billy Moore and others
Defendant:
Chemours Company, Dynax Corporation, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In re: Morgan
as 20-6123
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
