Cases 31 - 40 of 4,249
Brock-Robinson et al v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01967
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Joseph Robinson and Kellie Ann Michelle Brock-Robinson
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Strong v. Noojin et al
as 3:2024cv06024
Defendant:
Doe Corporation, Prisma Health Orthopedics, Prisma Health doing business as Prisma Health Medical Group-Midlands also known as Prisma Health Orthopedics and others
Plaintiff:
Brock Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Caldrello v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 24-2743
Defendant:
BROCK SCOTT, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, K&L GATES LLP and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA V. CALDRELLO
Clark v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Defendant:
Ryan Isonhart, Brian E Grice, Brock Lavin and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Loden et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Defendant:
Superintendent Unknown Dixon, Officer Unknown Bruce, Deanna Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Rico D. Malone and Roderikus Malone
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simba Kinga Project Trust v. Arvest Bank et al
as 8:2024cv02947
Defendant:
Brock & Scott PLLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Arvest Bank Kevin Sabin doing business as Arvest Central Mortgage & Central Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
Simba Kinga Project Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Jay Vermillion v. Tom Francum, et al
as 24-2797
Defendant:
TOM FRANCUM, JEFF MALOTT, BROCK TURNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Gilmore v. Gaden et al
as 4:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Byron T. Gilmore
Defendant:
Steve Brock and Ike Gaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
