Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Blaney v. Wright et al
as 3:2011cv00908
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blaney
Defendant:
Carolyn Wright, Jim Moseley and Gary Fitzsimmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaney v. Wright et al
as 6:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blaney
Defendant:
Carolyn Wright, Jim Moseley and Gary Fitzsimmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feimster v. Wright et al
as 5:2010cv03330
Plaintiff:
Mamie E Feimster
Defendant:
Carolyn Wright, Irene Wright and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2009cv03285
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Wade, Hazel McKnight, Edward Covert and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Wright v. Encore Orthopedics Inc et al
as 5:2008cv01378
Plaintiff:
Robert Wright and Carolyn Wright
Defendant:
Encore Orthopedics Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Telkamp v. Stein Mart, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01628
Plaintiff:
Eloisa G Telkamp
Defendant:
Stein Mart, Inc., Timothy Duffy, Karen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wright
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bowling, et al, v. Pfizer Inc, et al
as 1:1991cv00256
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Bowling , Julie Whyle , Janet Boggess and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Shiley Inc
Objector:
Putative class in Pennsylvania and Nellie Melling
Amicu:
Ministry of Health, Province of Alberta, Canada , Ministry of Health Province of Manitoba Canada , Public Citizen and others
Movant:
Janet E Metzger and James T. Capretz
Pecial_master:
Peter J Strauss
Trustee:
James A. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
