Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 191
Brooks v. Lundi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01668
Plaintiff: Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant: M Lundi, Donna M Ryu, Howard R Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2017cv01313
Plaintiff: Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant: United States Marshal Service , Michael Stiles , Timothy Susanin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Fox
as 3:2017cv03268
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Brooks
Respondent: Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Brooks v. C. David, et al
as 17-16101
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES ANTHONY BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee: C. DAVID, Doctor, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, N. PODOLSKY, RN and others
Hamm v. Bogel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00809
Plaintiff: Michael E Hamm
Defendant: NFN Bogel, Jr , Nikki Haley , John Magill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Brooks v. Columbus L. Swoops, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-50239
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES DAVID BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN R. KELLY
Brooks v. Fox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01209
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Brooks
Respondent: Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Brooks v. Alex Lile, et al
as 17-15203
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES ANTHONY BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee: ALEX LILE, Mail Room Supervisor, C. LOPEZ, Mail Room Staff and SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Brooks v. Fox We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00132
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Brooks
Respondent: Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff: Charles David Brooks
Defendant: Oliver J Bell, Brad Livingston, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?