Cases 31 - 40 of 80
KIMBERLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46692
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEAN KIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33295
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEAN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCamant v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2020cv00212
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dean McCamant
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Schein v. MDU Resources Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Christopher Dean Wells dba Wells Construction, Advanced Internet Marketing dba Choice Career Fairs, Freedom Working Capital and others
Plaintiff:
David D Schein
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
US v. Cristopher Gilbert
as 19-7528
Defendant / Appellant:
CRISTOPHER DEAN GILBERT, a/k/a Christopher Dean Gilbert, a/k/a Cris Gilbert
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parks v. Town of Bentonia, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00632
Plaintiff:
Felicia Parks
Defendant:
Officer Cole McGinnis, John Does 1-10, Yazoo County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMACHO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03279
Plaintiff:
JASON BOWERS, KING BRIAN, THOMAS BABB and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Camacho et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02228
Plaintiff:
Jason Bowers, King Brian, Thomas Babb and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Pender v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dean Pender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hall v. Daniels
as 5:2018cv00157
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Petitioner:
Christopher Dean Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
