Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Matthews v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06063
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officers John Does 1 and 2, Police Offier Christopher Sanchez, Tax Reg # 948129 and others
Plaintiff:
David Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04509
Defendant:
City of New York, Captain FNU Cruz, Shield #814, Correction Officer FNU Neal, Shield #5531 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Christopher Sanchez
as 15-3122
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ
Sanchez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12381
Plaintiff:
Harriet Irene Sanchez and Christopher Sanchez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. 4JLJ, LLC
as 2:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edwards, Francisco Gutierrez, Humberto J Morales and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango Jr.
Defendant:
4JLJ, LLC doing business as J4 Oilfield Services and John Jalufka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Beckford v. Sanchez
as 2:2015cv02127
Plaintiff:
Luke Beckford
Defendant:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Martinez v. Garza et al
as 5:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Alan Martinez
Defendant:
Maricela Garza, Bryson McIntire, Kimberly Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Sanchez
as 13-2224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02720
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
