Cases 31 - 40 of 546
SMITH v 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05252
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Tyler Christopher Smith
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02750
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
USA v. Christopher Smith
as 23-2451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, a/k/a JUGHEAD
Smith v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Tyler Christopher Smith
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, TRACIE WASSON, JESSICA LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jon Copeland
Defendant:
Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners, J. Steve Sheldon, Chuka D. Onyeneke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18277
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
