Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Simpson v. Martinez et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Micheal Vickers, Greg Soles, Jesse Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Kylvoski Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trail et al v. Coffee County, Tennessee
as 4:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Bellamy, Robert Trail and Paul Sylvia
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee
Bivens v. Coffee County et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eric Bivens
Defendant:
Jason Cauley, Doyle Wooten, Coffee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Polk County, Tennessee, Hamilton County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Accord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. (CCA) Coffee County Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00007
Defendant:
(CCA) Grievance Coordinator, Inmate Affairs, Mail Room, (CCA) Coffee County Correctional Facility, Coffee Regional Medical Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
James Allen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley-Pearson v. Martin et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Emily Misty Martin, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Coley-Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 5:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Doyle Wooten and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
Johnny Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTT v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 5:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Doyle Wooten and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
JOHN RALPH LOTT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Respondent:
COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and COFFEE COUNTY MAGISTRATE COURT
Petitioner:
SAMUEL E JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hadley v. Coffee County Commission
as 1:2020cv00733
Plaintiff:
Robert Hadley
Defendant:
Coffee County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
