Cases 31 - 40 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Hayes et al v. Compass Group USA Inc
as 4:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Brittany Hayes and Cassandra Quain
Defendant:
Compass Group USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Baldwin v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Brian Baldwin
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc. doing business as Canteen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Borrero v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Andres Borrero
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc. doing business as Canteen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McWilliams v. Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Richard McWilliams
Defendant:
Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC, Noble Drilling Services, Inc., Shell USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
