Cases 31 - 40 of 201
AMANALIGUI et al v. COTTLE et al
as 2:2022cv04299
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA AMANALIGUI, WILSON BAQUERO and YOLANDA AMUNATIGUI
Defendant:
ROBERT W. COTTLE, MATTHEW HOLLAND, MARK LOSCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00835
Plaintiff:
Acly, Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner, Hasan Altimimi and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cottle v. State of Missouri
as 4:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Cottle
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amunatigui et al v. The Cottle Firm et al
as 2:2022cv00361
Petitioner:
Yolanda Amunutigui and Wilson Bequero
Respondent:
The Cottle Firm and Robert W. Cottle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cottle et al v. Piper Aircraft, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv14043
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Cottle and CS Executive Services, LLC
Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc. and Cutter Aviation Dallas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campana et al v. Kaman & Cusimano LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
William A. Campana and Linda Campana
Defendant:
Kaman & Cusimano LLC, Joseph E. Di Baggio, Magistrate Kandi S. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cottle v. Fisher
as 4:2021cv10023
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Cottle
Defendant:
Dave Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ross v. Officer Cottle
as 4:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Ross
Defendant:
Officer Cottle, Collin County Sheriff's Office, Collin County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTLE v. U.S. CONGRESS et al
as 1:2021cv02352
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. COTTLE, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U. S. CONGRESS, U.S. DOJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
