Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Carter El-Bey v. Gessner et al
as 3:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
Dianne Michele Carter El-Bey
Defendant:
Paul G. Gessner, Forrest D. Bridges, F. Lane Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinton v. Bridges
as 5:2014ct03128
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wray v. Bridges et al
as 1:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Wray, Jr.
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Richard L. Shaffer, Sarah Kirby Turner and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2014ct03073
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Roy Cooper and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00214
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinton v. Evans et al
as 5:2013ct03307
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Rebecca C. Evans, Jane Doe, Forrest D. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bridges, et al
as 5:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges and James C. Dever, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kilgore et al v. Red River County, Texas et al
as 5:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Freda Gale Kilgore and Eddie L Goforth
Defendant:
Red River County, Texas , Robert D. Bridges and Bob E Cabler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRAY v. SAUNDER et al
as 1:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Defendant:
SORELL SAUNDER, PAT MCCRORY, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Christian Hoel, Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
