Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 17-5172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-6817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-6648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv02358
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Doug Cook, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coomer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Mary Coomer
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Daniel Henry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Henry v. Greby et al
as 1:2014cv01157
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henry
Defendant:
Carla Greby, . Sword, . Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv30711
Plaintiff:
Lucy A. Henry and Daniel Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Mitchell v. Daniel Hampton
as 13-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HENRY HAMPTON and R. STEVEN HEARN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
