Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 566
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant: Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bierwirth v. AII Acquisition Corporation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Defendant: Alan MRO Supply Inc., Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. doing business as Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. formerly known as Statewide Industrial Equipment Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor by Merger to Sager-Spuck Supply Co., Inc., BW/IP International Co. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Bierwirth and Gloria Bierwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant: Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant: Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant: Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant: Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff: Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Hyegate, LLC et al v. Boghossian We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01450
Petitioner: DAP, LLC, Aragats Perlite, OJSC and Hyegate, LLC
Respondent: Ashot Boghossian and Ashot Poghosyan
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Lawrence et al v. DAP Products, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff: Mr. Curtis Lawrence, Skyward Transportation, LLC and Curtis Lawrence
Defendant: DAP Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jesse Simpson v. A. McCabe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-6282
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee: A. MCCABE, DAP-C Chief of Psychology, C. GOMEZ, Warden, WOLEVER, Associate Warden and others
Christiansen v. Federal Cartridge Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: Lori Ann Christiansen
Defendant: Federal Cartridge Company, CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant: KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff: LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Perkins v. S.C.C.F. Core Civic et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff: Jerome Perkins
Defendant: S.C.C.F. Core Civic, (f/n/u) Perry, R-DAP Program - Counselors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant: AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant: PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?