Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Jane Doe et al v. Zucker et al
as 1:2020cv00840
Plaintiff:
Jane Joe, Jane Boe, Sr., Childrens Health Defense and others
Defendant:
Randall Squier, David P. Bennardo, New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 20-6649
Defendant / Appellee:
D. GOODE, G. MILITANA, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DR. L. WANG, Physician, LESLIE S. GREEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Richardson v. Murry et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Dr. L. Murry and Chaplain Adekola
Plaintiff:
Devin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, B. RAVIZEE MONAHAN, QMHP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Fauntleroy v. Jacobs
as 1:2019cv05427
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fauntleroy
Defendant:
Dr. L. Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordell Ford v. Anthony Matushak et al
as 2:2019cv01005
Defendant:
Todd Hamilton, Anthony Matushak, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Cordell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Beene, William v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Sgt. Weicker, Cathy Jess, C.O. Paul and others
Plaintiff:
William Beene
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford, Cordell v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, C.O. Anthony Matushak, John Doe #1 and others
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Cordell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
