Cases 31 - 40 of 205,910
Lownsdale v. McDonough
as 24-1919
Claimant:
JAMES E. LOWNSDALE
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Upstream Holdings, LLC v. Brekunitch
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
UPSTREAM HOLDINGS, LLC
Counter Defendant:
MIDWAY METALS LLC, CONTRACTOR METALS, LLC, ERIC BACHMAN and others
Defendant:
M AND M MACHINERY, DOES, 1-7, MARTIN LOPEZ, SR. and others
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Eddie Julian-Bey v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1495
Plaintiff:
EDDIE ARMALL JULIAN-BEY
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden and others
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Tyler W. Norman, Sgt. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hayes et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
William Q. Hayes, John A. Houston, Judge Bernard G. Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
