Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Eline et al v. Town of Ocean City Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Chelsea C Eline , Megan A Bryant , Rose R MacGregor and others
Defendant:
Town of Ocean City Maryland, Richard W Meehan, Joseph J Theobald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eline et al v. MacGregor
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Chelsea C Eline, Megan A Bryant, Christine E Coleman and others
Defendant:
Rose R MacGregor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2017cv08781
Plaintiff:
Toni E Coleman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03698
Plaintiff:
Curtis E Coleman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv01824
Plaintiff:
Tammi E. Coleman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Coleman et al
as 2:2017cv05477
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA N.A., Gregory Coleman, Robin E. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Robert Coleman v. Debbie Asuncion
as 17-71630
Petitioner:
ROBERT E. COLEMAN
Respondent:
DEBBIE ASUNCION
Coleman v. Virga et al
as 2:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
T. Virga, Jeff Macomber, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN et alv. KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. COLEMAN and SHARON COLEMAN
Defendant:
KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. , KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC and TEKEDRA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
