Cases 31 - 40 of 49
TERRY v. TERRY et al
as 2:2013cv03098
Plaintiff:
DANIEL E. TERRY
Defendant:
DOUGLAS P. TERRY and LINDA DECHARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00577
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
St. Louis v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv02935
Plaintiff:
Lucner St. Louis
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., J. A. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terry v. Helm et al
as 7:2012cv00134
Defendant:
Danville Police Department, Officer Helm and Sergeant Yeman
Plaintiff:
Rod E. Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2012cv00135
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia and Joseph H.M. Schenk, Jr
Petitioner:
Rod E. Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Postal Service et al
as 5:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
Mark A Ross
Defendant:
U S Postal Service and Virginia E Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Terry v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv09684
Plaintiff:
James E. Terry
Defendant:
The City of New York , Victor Rivas, Eric Dym and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51639
Plaintiff:
ALFRED E. TERRY JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
United States of America v. Terry et al
as 1:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lauralee E. Terry, Carl Terry, Michael Moree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Price v. Toney et al
as 2:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Prince Price
Defendant:
Michael Toney , Stephen C. Tucker , JaBurs E. Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
