Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Coleman v. Fox et al
as 1:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
Edward Henry Coleman
Defendant:
John B Fox, FNU Mendoza, W Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Edward Coleman
as 14-56497
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD COLEMAN, AKA Back Boy, AKA Big Crafty, AKA Black Boy, AKA Blackboy, AKA Edward Coleman, Jr., AKA Edward Henry Coleman, AKA Keith Henry Coleman, AKA Crazy Keith, AKA Keith, AKA Tiny Keith, AKA TK
Pratt v. USA
as 4:2014cv00041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edward Henry Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HENRIES v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2013cv06341
Petitioner:
EDWARD HENRIES
Respondent:
DELBERT SAUERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cantrell v. Brown
as 2:2011cv00245
Petitioner:
Edward Henry Cantrell
Respondent:
Dennis Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv35233
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HENRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Edward Lombana-Cano v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-14873
Petitioner:
EDWARD HENRY LOMBANA-CANO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Henry v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 10-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, Albuquerque Police Department, a municipal entity organized under the laws of the State of New Mexico and its law enforcement agency, MARTIN J. CHAVEZ, Individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Albuquerque, RAY SCHULTZ, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Albuquerque and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
