Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Ricks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25782
Plaintiff:
Mica Frisbie Ricks and Edward Keith Ricks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Dembry v. United State
as 14-2430
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Dembry v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00183
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eckloff et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05245
Plaintiff:
Susan Eckloff and Edward Keith Eckloff
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Dembry v. United State
as 13-1818
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edward Keith Dembry
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Dembry v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00050
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward Keith Lee
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center, Rutherford County and David Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith #624999 v. Harry
as 1:2012cv00071
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Keith #624999, Jr.
Respondent:
Shirlee Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes et al v. Unicoi County, TN et al
as 2:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lesley Hughes , Tonya Casey , Edward Keith Foster and others
Defendant:
Unicoi County Emergency Communications District and Unicoi County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DEMBRY v. OLIVER
as 2:2011cv00210
Petitioner:
EDWARD KEITH DEMBRY
Respondent:
WARDEN JOHN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
