Cases 31 - 40 of 1,356
Ballard v. Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Elbert Ballard
Defendant:
Medical Staff at Hamilton Aged & Infirmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annie Grant, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 23-13921
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANNIE LOIS GRANT, QUENTIN T. HOWELL, ELROY TOLBERT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA, SARA TINDALL GHAZAL, ANH LE and others
Anderson v. White
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Elbert L. Anderson
Defendant:
Troy L. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Flowers v. Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Division of Child Support Services
as 4:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Elbert D Flowers
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Division of Child Support Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Melton v. Rump (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheila Rump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton, Jr. v. Brooks (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Connie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Town of Gordon (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Ray (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Shana Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Lowe (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Albert Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Rafferty (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
