Cases 31 - 40 of 393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hill et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brian Hill, Jason Mathis and Cruz Vasquez
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv05196
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS and Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 7:2022cv04556
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish and Tony Bradley
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hurt v. PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael C Hurt
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc. and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., FRITO-LAY, INC. and PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
