Cases 31 - 40 of 1,570
FARRIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00007
Petitioner:
ANDREW FARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
King v. Accell Schools LLC
as 4:2023cv13308
Plaintiff:
Antonio King
Defendant:
Accell Schools LLC, Nicole Arnold and Pamela Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv13158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FARRIS v. USA
as 1:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
ROGER WESLEY FARRIS and ROBERT F. MORELLO, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Ford, Jr. v. John Stanley, et al
as 23-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Stanley, Sheriff, Lonoke County, William Robert Shipp, Administrator, Lonoke County, T. Smith and others
Vallejo v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Rick Farris, Ms Fredieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
