Cases 1 - 10 of 1,567
Williams v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriff Whitehorn and Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Berryman v. Deluca et al
as 2:2024cv11038
Plaintiff:
Philip W. Berryman
Defendant:
Tiffany Deluca, Labron, George Stephenson and others
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okorie v. First Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
First Bank, Eileen N. Shaffer and Timothy Matthew Farris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sufyan Hassan et al v. City of Laguna Beach et al
as 8:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Sufyan Hassan and Mahtab Bolbolan
Defendant:
City of Laguna Beach, Zachary Oblea, Matthew Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Steven LaTulippe
Defendant:
Oregon Medical Board, Kathleen Harder, Ali Mageehon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
