Cases 31 - 40 of 2,397
GENTRY v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
BONNIE GENTRY
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gentry Carrier v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10161
Petitioner:
GENTRY GERAURD CARRIER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Benjamin Gentry
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Benjamin Tyler Gentry
Gentry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
George D Gentry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kim v. Sheriff Matt Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Mung Sian Kim
Respondent:
Sheriff Matt Gentry and Judge Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gentry v. Wal Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Trenisha Gentry
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gentry, James v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60115
Plaintiff:
James Gentry
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gentry et al v. Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gentry, Hoa Nguyen, Thao Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC and Robinson Property Group, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Tunica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Timothy Gentry v. Randall Hepp
as 23-3321
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY B. GENTRY
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Gentry v. Rincones et al
as 9:2023cv07045
Plaintiff:
Rex A. Gentry
Defendant:
Paul Daniel Rincones and National OnDemand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
