Cases 31 - 40 of 1,043
Feeley v. Goss
as 23-1689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN L. FEELEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY GOSS, Chief of Police, Mechanic Falls Police Department and JEFFREY GOSS, Chief of Police, Mechanic Falls Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Van Huisen v. Goss
as 5:2023cv04210
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Porter Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
LaShawnda Goss
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Goss v. Garrison Protective Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05737
Plaintiff:
Vashon Goss
Defendant:
Garrison Protective Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
GOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17565
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GOSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brasfield v. Goss et al
as 1:2023cv04343
Plaintiff:
Debra Brasfield
Defendant:
Shunte Goss and April Senter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Zayas-Cintron v. Hicks, et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Luis Guil Zayas-Cintron
Defendant:
C.O. Hicks, Ms. Goss, C.O. Fieni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEELEY v. GOSS
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L FEELEY
Defendant:
JEFFERY GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
