Cases 31 - 40 of 5,015
Williams v. Biggs
as 24-30164
Plaintiff:
Jevin Williams and Glendale Hampton
Defendant:
Daniel Biggs and Daniel Biggs, individually and his official capacity as an officer for the Orleans Levee District Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr. and Jarvis Jermaine Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Woodmen et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applied Minds, LLC v. Guild Hall of East Hampton, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01465
Counter Defendant:
Applied Minds, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Guild Hall of East Hampton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Donald Parker v. C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
