Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GUZMAN et al v. WALTER KINARD WELDING, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
GEORGE GUZMAN, JOSE GARZA and RICARDO LOPEZ
Defendant:
WALTER KINARD WELDING, LLC, HALIBURTON COMPANY and Haliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Michael L. Holland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Corizon Medical et al
as 3:2016cv03298
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, FBI Director (f/n/u) Comey, Jeb Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Supreme Pro Clean LLC v. Lowry et al
as 5:2016cv05117
Plaintiff:
Supreme Pro Clean LLC
Defendant:
Linda Lowry and Dahlia Haliburton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carl Reed, et al v. John Mackey, et al
as 16-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL REED and CONSTANCE HALIBURTON-BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. MACKEY, In his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer, WHOLE FOODS MARKET-MIDWEST INC, doing business as SOUTHGATE TOWER MALL, WHOLE FOODS MARKETS and others
Reed et al v. Mackey et al
as 1:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed and Constance Haliburton-Reed
Defendant:
John P. Mackey, Whole Foods Market-Midwest Inc, Whole Foods Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
In re: Harold Haliburton
as 16-10057
Petitioner:
In re: HAROLD HALIBURTON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Freddie Haliburton v. C. O'Bryan, et al
as 15-14476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE LEE HALIBURTON
Defendant - Appellee:
C. O'BRYAN, Correctonal Officer, D. BAKER, Correctional Officer, A. LUNGFORD, Correctional Officer and others
Carla's Pasta, Inc. v. Haliburton International Foods, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01345
Plaintiff:
Carla's Pasta, Inc.
Defendant:
Haliburton International Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
